1139 symlinks created $ brew install curl-ca-bundle == file and set an environment variable to install the certificate authorities needed by the Open SSL library.
You can also try hacking the open-uri source: How to Use an Application Template from Github when You’re Developing in Rails on Windows server configuration used for the Cloudfront service (Amazon Web Services) used for Ruby Gems file hosting. For the example apps and tutorials, it's best to open an issue on Git Hub so we can help you.
You can issue certificates for let's say: example.com, blog.and admin.for free.
Updating ssl certificate problems holy dating relationships
In the case of a new application generated from an application template hosted on Git Hub, the Ruby language interpreter uses Open SSL to connect to Git Hub.
Git Hub requires all connections to be made using .
These problems are most common with Ruby 2.1 on Mac OS X.
For problems with Windows or Ubuntu, see the end of the article.
Generally there are no consequences of this for you.
If you build your own software and it requires this formula, you'll need to add to your build variables: LDFLAGS: -L/usr/local/opt/openssl/lib CPPFLAGS: -I/usr/local/opt/openssl/include == Summary /usr/local/Cellar/openssl/1.0.1e: 429 files, 15M, built in 3.9 minutes $ brew link openssl --force Linking /usr/local/Cellar/openssl/1.0.1e...
Instead of For Mac OS and Linux, “home path” means ~/.gemrc. For Windows XP, “home path” means C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\gemrc. (Suggested by Andrew Fallows in a Stack Overflow discussion). It opens a possible security vulnerability (discussed here). Mac OS X already provides this software and installing another version in parallel can cause all kinds of trouble.
The Open SSL provided by OS X is too old for some software.
Simply put, insecure sites being served over HTTP will rank worse than secure sites being served over HTTPS. It won't take long until all insecure sites are seen as being malicious and untrustworthy, even if you're technically not doing anything wrong.
Although honestly, I would classify not securing your site as doing your visitors a disservice. That's because insecure sites transmit all data over plain text.
If their account gets compromised, guess who they're gong to blame? It's your responsibility as a site owner to protect your visitors from such attacks...1.